TYPES OF DISCUSSIONS
(From Joanne G. Kurfiss Critical Thinking: Theory,
Research, Practice and Possibilities,
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no.2, Washington, D.C. 1988, p. 67)
Quiz show: Students answer information questions posed by the teacher. Such discussions reinforce dualism and received knowledge.
Rambling bull sessions: These are opinion-sharing conversations.
Wrangling bull sessions: If the discussion takes a controversial turn, the discussion can become an argument in which each person takes a position and defends it.
Bull sessions reinforce multiplicity/subjective knowledge and no true exchange or thoughtful evaluation of ideas take place.
True discussions are informational, problematical, dialectical, and reflexive
In informational discussions, the teacher encourages students to speak, defers controversy, and lets students know their ideas will not be evaluated.
In problematical discussions a problem-posing query has the participants consider the information and/or values needed to address the issue intelligently
In dialectical discussions, the request is made for participants to state opponentsÕ views accurately and sympathetically (i.e., take a ÔdevilÕs advocateÕ view). This encourages students to Òsynthesize diverse opinions into a new formulation of the issue or to agree to disagree but with a better understanding of the nature of their differences.Ó
In reflexive discussions, participants discuss their own discussion in order to learn from the process.
The professor can guide students through these four types by the judicious use of appropriate questions and responses. Effective responses include praise and building on responses, directing comments and questions to other students, and remaining silent. Asking for opinions without evaluation enables students to become comfortable with talking, a request for elaboration of a comment steps up the challenge for students, using a devilÕs advocate strategy can cool down a heated discussion and avoid making people feel they are Ôwrong,Õ and so on.
(From: UPEI
Summer Faculty Development Institute (Serge Piccinin), 2002.)
¥
Asking too
many questions at once
¥
Asking a question and answering it yourself
¥
Asking questions only of the brightest or most likeable
¥
Asking a difficult question too early
¥
Asking irrelevant questions
¥
Always asking the same type of questions
¥
Asking questions in a threatening way
¥
Not indicating a change in the type of questions
¥
Not using probing questions
¥
Not giving time to think
¥
Not correcting wrong answers
¥
Ignoring answers
¥
Failing to see the implications of answers
¥
Failing to build on answers