CASE.EDU:    HOME | DIRECTORIES | SEARCH
case western reserve university

THE CENTER FOR GENETIC RESEARCH ETHICS & LAW

 

CENTER DOCUMENTS

Coalition for Genetic Fairness - Genetic Nondiscrimination

 

I attended the Coalition for Genetic Fairness meeting about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2005 (S. 306) on February 22, 2005 in Washington, DC. This Act passed in the Senate on February 14, 2005 by a vote of 98-0. The meeting was concerned with informing and organizing the participating member organizations of the Coalition so that each, in turn, can inform and organize their membership to make contact with persons in a position to help the House version of the bill win passage in the House of Representatives.

The Coalition for Genetic Fairness has hired the lobbying firm of B&D Sagamore to develop and implement a strategy of effective advocacy in favor of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Members of the Coalition are asked to complete a membership form and to make a membership contribution (immediately, if possible) to fund this strategic plan of targeted advocacy.

Francis Collins of the NIH’s NHGRI presented opening remarks / a “keynote address.” Unfortunately, sometime after the initial notice of the meeting was sent out, the location for the meeting was changed from B&D Sagamore Offices at 805 15th Street to the Genetics & Public Policy Center at 1717 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 530. I learned of the change only after arriving at the 15th Street offices and had to hail another cab to travel to the new location. Due to my later arrival, I missed most Dr. Collins’ remarks, but did hear some of the questions and his responses.

Frank Swain and Debra Lappin (both of B&D Sagamore) both spoke about the advocacy strategy and the potential power of the diverse coalition in terms of numbers and in terms of the ability to help engage the public and lawmakers (both a “grassroots/grasstops strategy” as Frank Swain described it).

Sharon Terry, CGF Executive Committee Chair, spoke about membership in CGF and member organization’s roles and responsibilities. Members are asked not to act alone, but to be ready to act jointly as members of a coalition. Direction will come from the offices of B&D Sagamore and the CGF executive committee. Members are also asked not to share the strategy in order that it be most effective when each stage is implemented. CGF bylaws were distributed. Member organizations were also asked to use their contacts to bring other non-profits and appropriate organizations into the Coalition.

I don’t know whether CGREAL intends to become a member organization of CGF or not. You do have electronic membership form and the contact is still James O’Leary. I have the small packet of materials that were distributed containing a fact sheet, the bylaws, and some of the statements and press releases made about the Senate’s passage of the Act. I have also just received 3 emails within the last 24 hours asking that member organizations begin to contact certain persons as part of the targeted advocacy for this Act. Please let me know what you would like me to do. I know that you are supportive of the Coalition’s position, but I want to honor their request for confidentiality beyond members of the Coalition.

Reference was made to the following report that may be of interest to you. “Faces of Genetic Discrimination: How Genetic Discrimination Affects Real People” 2004 July; 25 p. [Online]. Available: http://www.nationalpartnership.org/portals/p3/library/GeneticDiscrimination/FacesofGeneticDiscrimination.pdf


President’s Council on Bioethics

I attended the first presentation at the PCBE meeting on Thursday, March 3. The sessions focused on various aspects of “Aging and Caregiving” and were not directly relevant to CGREAL. Susan may have something to report from the Friday, March 4 sessions. Topics were “Alternative Sources of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells” (Council Draft White Paper) and “Human-Animal Chimeras.”
ions