CASE.EDU:    HOME | DIRECTORIES | SEARCH
case western reserve university

THE CENTER FOR GENETIC RESEARCH ETHICS & LAW

 

RESEARCH GROUPS


Population Studies Issues

Convener: Dena S. Davis
Collaborators: Melissa Barber, Petrice Brown Atwood Gaines, Mary Quinn Griffin, Sharona Hoffman, Eric Juengst, Patricia Marshall, Stephen Post, Georgia Wiesner, and Shlomit Zuckeman

Under the leadership of Dena S. Davis, this research group involves anthropologists, legal scholars, philosophers, and religious studies scholars with clinical geneticists, human geneticists, and health behavior researchers in interdisciplinary examinations of the issues of personal and group identity that arise in population-based genetic research.

The group uses the interpretive methods of the humanities, law, and cultural anthropology to reflect on the descriptive information gathered by the Family Studies and Community Studies research groups. The results will be related to the cultural, religious, and political traditions regarding personal and group identity of the populations under study.

As an initial pilot study, they focused on three American populations, whose identities are defined in different ways but whose experience of genetic research is nevertheless significantly influenced by their identity perceptions: African Americans; Ashkenazi Jews; American elderly.

Research Questions:

1. What roles do genetic factors play in the cultural construction of group and individual identities for African Americans, Jews, and the American elderly.

2. How does the enterprise of genetic research (in the questions it chooses to ask, the results it reports, and the mediation of those results in public discourse) contribute to or challenge those cultural constructions?

Rationale:

How we relate to our genetic identities is our choice (an expression of our autonomy), but many societal forces influence that choice. African Americans, Ashkenazi Jews, and the American elderly are rich examples of how the interplay between genetic information and personal identity is influenced by our societal context, although for different reasons. For example, a person of mixed ancestry who discovers that she has sickle cell trait may come to identify more with the African-American part of her heritage because of the way her ancestry affects her future. At the same time, community-based public health campaigns, such as Tay-Sachs screening programs, may draw her and her Jewish husband into close engagement with Jewish institutions, even if they both lack a strong religious identity. Further, while the burden of social prejudice may encourage her to convert to Judaism to allow herself and her children to legitimately "pass" as Jewish, law and public policy may set up certain benefits to claiming an African-American racial identity, such as access to minority training funds. Finally, the discovery of a personal vulnerability to age-associated health problems such as Alzheimer disease may precipitate a person's re-identification as someone entering old age, because of the roles in which we cast the elderly in our society.