1. Davis, D., Genetic Research and Communal Narratives. Hastings Center Report, 2004. 15(1): p. 40-49.
2. Juengst, E.T., FACE facts: why human genetics will always provoke bioethics. J Law Med Ethics, 2004. 32(2): p. 267-75, 191.
3. Marshall, P., The individual and the community in international genetic research. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2004. 15(1): p. 76-86.
4. Mehlman, M.J., et al., Anti-Aging Medicine: Can Consumers Be Better Protected? The Gerontologist, 2004. 44(3): p. 304-310.
5. Binstock, R.H., The Politics and Ethics of Anti-Aging Science. Asia-Pacific Biotech News, 2005. 9(5): p. 708-711.
6. Gaines, A., Race: Local biology and culture in mind, in Companion to Psychological Anthropology. 2005, Blackwell.
7. Hoffman, S., "Racially-tailored" medicine unraveled. Am Univ Law Rev, 2005. 55(2): p. 395-452.
8. Hoffman, S., Is there a place for race as a legal concept? Arizona State Law Journal, 2005. 36: p. 1093 -.
9. Hoffman, S. and J.W. Berg, The suitability of IRB liability. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 2005. 67: p. 2365-427.
10. Johnson, S., N.E. Kass, and M. Natowicz, Disclosure of personal medical information: differences among parents and affected adults for genetic and nongenetic conditions. Genet Test, 2005. 9(3): p. 269-80.
11. Marshall, P., Human rights, cultural pluralism and international health research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2005. 26(6): p. 529-557.
12. Marshall, P., Commentary: Research on Noma in Rural Nigeria, in International Research Ethics: A Case Book, W.E. Lavery JV, Grady E, Emanuel EJ, Editor. 2005, Oxford University Press: New York.
13. Mehlman, M.J., Genetic enhancement: plan now to act later. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 2005. 15(1): p. 77-82.
14. Natowicz, M., Newborn screening--setting evidence-based policy for protection. N Engl J Med, 2005. 353(9): p. 867-70.
15. Whitehouse, P. and E. Juengst, Anti-Aging Medicine and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005. 53(8): p. 1417-22.
16. Binstock, R.H., J.R. Fishman, and T.E. Johnson, Anti-Aging Medicine and Science: Social Implications, in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 6th edition, R.H. Binstock and L.K. George, Editors. 2006, Academic Press: San Diego, CA. p. 436-455.
17. Binstock, R.H., J.R. Fishman, and E.T. Juengst, Boundaries and labels: anti-aging medicine and science. Rejuvenation Res, 2006. 9(4): p. 433-5.
18. Davis, D., Genetic Testing: Care and Consent, and Liability, in Genetic Testing and Tort Actions, N. Sharpe, Carter, RF., Editor. 2006.
19. Dressler, L.G. and E.T. Juengst, Thresholds and boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results. Am J Bioeth, 2006. 6(6): p. 18-20; author reply W10-2.
20. Gaines, A., Alzheimer Disease, Aging, Chance and "Race" Journal of Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 2006. 13(1): p. 83-85.
21. Gaines, A. and P.J. Whitehouse, Building a Mystery: Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Beyond. Journal of Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 2006. 13(1): p. 61-74.
22. Juengst, E., Alter-ing the Human Species? Misplaced Essentialism in Science Policy, in The Ethics of Inheritable Genetic Modication, J. Rasko, O'Sullivan, G., Ankeny, R., Editor. 2006, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
23. Juengst, E., Population-based Genetic Research and Screening: Conceptual and Ethical Issues, in The Handbook of Bioethics, B. Steinbok, Editor. 2006, Oxford.
24. Marshall, P., Commentary: Politics, Culture, and Governance in the Development of Prior informed Consent in Indigenous Communities: JP Rosenthal. Current Anthropology 2006. 47(1): p. 134-135.
25. Marshall, P., Informed consent in international health research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human-Research Ethics, 2006. 1(1): p. 25-42.
26. Marshall, P., Ethical Issues in Research Design and Informed Consent to Biomedical and Social Research in Resource Poor Settings. Special Topics in Social, Economic and Behavioral Research Series of Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. 2006, Geneva: World Health Organization.
27. Marshall, P. and J. Berg, Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2006. 6(3): p. 28-29.
28. Marshall, P.A., et al., Voluntary Participation and Informed Consent to International Genetic Research. American Journal of Public Health, 2006. 96(11): p. 1989-1995.
29. Mehlman, M.J., E. Banger, and M. Wright, Doping in Sports and the Use of State Power. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2006. 50: p. 15–73.
30. Aulisio, M.P., M. Devita, and D. Luebke, Taking values seriously: Ethical challenges in organ donation and transplantation for critical care professionals. Crit Care Med, 2007. 35(2 Suppl): p. S95-101.
31. Davis, D., Help! My Body Is Being Invaded by an Alien! The American Journal of Bioethics, 2007. 7(4): p. 60 - 61.
32. Davis, D.S., The Changing Face of "Misidentified Paternity". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2007. 32(4): p. 359 - 373.
33. Dressler, L., Control and Use of Banked Human Specimens in Research. Biospecimen Ownership Counterpoint. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention and Biomarkers, 2007. 16(2): p. 190-191.
34. Goddard, K.A., et al., Awareness and use of direct-to-consumer nutrigenomic tests, United States, 2006. Genet Med, 2007. 9(8): p. 510-7.
35. Goddard, K.A.B., Public Health Surveillance of Awareness and Use of Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing in 13th Meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society. 2007.
36. Hoffman, S. and A. Podgurski, Securing the HIPAA Security Rule. Journal of Internet Law, 2007. 10(1).
37. Hoffman, S. and A. Podgurski, In Sickness, Health, and Cyberspace: Protecting the Security of Electronic Private Health Information. Boston College Law Review, 2007. 48(331).
38. Juengst, E., Genetic Testing and Screening: Population screening, in The Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 2007, MacMillan Pub Co: New York. p. 1007-1015.
39. Juengst, E., Annotating the Moral Map of Enhancement: Gene Doping, the Limits of Medicine and the Spirit of Sport, in Ethics, Geneics and the Future of sport: Implications of Gnetic Modification Selection, T. Murray, Editor. 2007, Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.
40. Juengst, E. and A. Goldenberg, Genetic diagnostic, pedigree and screening research, in The Oxford Textbook on The Ethics of Clinical Research, E. Emanuel, Grady, C., Reidar, L Miller, F. Wendler, D.. Editor. 2007, Oxford University Press.
41. Juengst, E.T. and H. Grankvist, Ethical Issues in Human Gene Transfer: A Historical Overview, in Principles of Health Care Ethics (Second Edition), R.E. Ashcroft, et al., Editors. 2007. p. 789-796.
42. Leppert, M., et al., Community Engagement, Public Consultation, and Informed Consent in the International HapMap Project. Community Genetics, 2007. 10(3): p. 186-198.
43. Marshall, P., Cultural Competence and Informed Consent in International Health Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2007. 17(2): p. 206-215.
44. Natowicz, M., et al., Access to Health Insurance: Experiences and Attitudes of those with Genetic versus Non-genetic Medical conditions. American Journal Medical Genetics, 2007. 143A(7): p. 707-717.
45. Rodriguez-Arias, D., et al., Advance directives and the family: French and American perspectives. Clin Ethics, 2007. 2(3): p. 139-145.
46. Youngner, S.J., The Stakes Are Not Very High in This Game. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2007. 7(4): p. 42 - 43.
47. Aulisio, M.P. and R.M. Arnold, Role of the Ethics Committee*. Chest, 2008. 134(2): p. 417-424.
48. Davis, D.S., A Thoughtful Look at Disability. Hastings Center Report, 2008. 38: p. 54-55.
49. Fishman, J.R., R.H. Binstock, and M.A. Lambrix, Anti-aging science: The emergence, maintenance, and enhancement of a discipline. Journal of Aging Studies, 2008. 22(4): p. 295-303.
50. Foster, M.W. and R.R. Sharp, Out of sequence: How consumer genomics could displace clinical genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2008. 9(6): p. 419-419.
51. Foster, M.W. and R.R. Sharp, The contractual genome: how direct-to-consumer genomic services may help patients take ownership of their DNA. Personalized Medicine, 2008. 5(4): p. 399-404.
52. Goddard, K.A., et al., Public Awareness and Use of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Results From 3 State Population-Based Surveys, 2006. Am J Public Health, 2008.
53. Hoffman, S. and A. Podgurski, Finding a Cure: The Case for Regulation and Oversight of Electronic Health Record Systems. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2008. 22(103).
54. Hull, S.C., et al., Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2008. 8(10): p. 62-70.
55. McGowan, M.L., Producing Users of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Dominant and Marginalized Discourses in the US Context, in Yearbook 2007 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society, A. Bammé, G. Getzinger, and B. Wieser, Editors. 2008, Profil.: Munich and Vienna. p. 95-110.
56. McGowan, M.L. and J.R. Fishman, Using Lessons Learned From BRCA Testing and Marketing: What Lies Ahead for Whole Genome Scanning Services. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2008. 8(6): p. 18 - 20.
57. Mehlman, M.J. and J.W. Berg, Human subjects protections in biomedical enhancement research: Assessing risk and benefit and obtaining informed consent. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2008. 36(3): p. 546-549.
58. Nagao, N., et al., Clinical Ethics Consultation: Examining how American and Japanese experts analyze an Alzheimer's case. BMC Medical Ethics, 2008. 9(1): p. 2.
59. Settersten Jr, R.A., M.A. Flatt, and R. Ponsaran, From the lab to the front line: How individual biogerontologists navigate their contested field. Journal of Aging Studies, 2008. 22(4): p. 304-312.
60. Simon, C., et al., Patient interest in recording family histories of cancer via the Internet. Genet Med, 2008. 10(12): p. 895-902.
61. Berg, J., et al., Making All the Children Above Average: Ethical and Regulatory Concerns for Pediatricians in Pediatric Enhancement Research. Clinical Pediatrics 2009. 48(5): p. 472-80.
62. Cogdell, K.J., Saving the Leftovers: Models for Banking Cord Blood Stem Cells. The University of Memphis Law Review, 2009. 39: p. 227-252.
63. Davis, D.S., The Parental Investment Factor in the Child’s Right to an Open Future. Hastings Center Report, 2009. 39(2): p. 24-27.
64. Farrell, R.M., et al., Patient Education and Informed Consent for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Health Literacy for Genetics and Assisted Reproductive Technology. Genetics in Medicine, 2009. 11(9): p. 640-645.
65. Foster, M.W., J.J. Mulvihill, and R.R. Sharp, Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. Genetics in Medicine, 2009. 11(8): p. 570-574 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a2743e.
66. Goddard, K.A., et al., Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics, 2009. 12(2): p. 92-104.
67. Juengst, E.T., Metagenomic Metaphors: New Images of the Human from ‘Translational’ Genomic Research, in New Visions of Nature: Complexity and Authenticity, M. Drenthen, J. Keulartz, and J. Proctor, Editors. 2009, Springer. p. 129-45.
68. May, T. and M.P. Aulisio, Personal morality and professional obligations: rights of conscience and informed consent. Perspect Biol Med, 2009. 52(1): p. 30-8.
69. McGowan, M.L. and M.A. Lambrix, Are Social Networkers and Genome Testers One in the Same?: The Limitations of Public Opinion Research for Guiding Clinical Practice. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2009. 9(6-7): p. 21-23.
70. Mehlman, M.J., The Price of Perfection: Individualism and Society in the Era of Biomedical Enhancement. 2009, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U. Press.
71. Nordgren, A. and E.T. Juengst, Can genomics tell me who I am? Essentialistic rhetoric in direct-to-consumer DNA testing. New Genetics and Society, 2009. 28(2): p. 157 - 172.
72. Sharp, R.R., et al., Helping Patients Make Informed Choices About Probiotics: A Need for Research. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009. 104(4): p. 809-813.
73. Tarini, B.A., et al., Not without my Permission: Parents' Willingness to Permit Use of Newborn Screening Samples for Research. Public Health Genomics, 2009. 11: p. 11.
74. Whitehouse, P. and D. George, The art of medicine: Banking on stories for healthier cognitive ageing. Lancet, 2009. 373: p. 1166-167.
75. Fishman, J.R., R.A. Settersten, and M.A. Flatt, In the Vanguard of Biomedicine? The 'Return' to the Art of Medicine in the Anti-Aging Movement. Sociology of Health and Illness, accepted.
76. Mehlman, M.J., et al., Enhancement research in children: Ethical concerns from pediatricians. Clinical Pediatrics, Accepted.
77. Davis, D.S., Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children's Futures. 2nd ed. Forthcoming, 2009, New York: Oxford University Press.
78. Davis, D.S., How Genes Tell Stories. Forthcoming, 2010, New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Binstock, R.H. and J.R. Fishman, Social dimensions of anti-aging science and medicine, in International handbook of social gerontology, D. Dannefer and C. Phillipson, Editors. In press, Sage Publications.
80. Binstock, R.H., J.R. Fishman, and E.T. Juengst, The Ethics, Sociology, and Politics of Anti-Aging Medicine and Science, in Beyond Therapy, T. Runkel, Editor. in press, Institut für Wissenschaft und Ethik: Bonn, Germany.
81. Goldenberg, A. and B. Wilfond, Pediatric biobanks: Approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. The Journal of Pediatrics, In press.
82. Kenney, N.J. and M.L. McGowan, Looking Back: Egg Donors’ Retrospective Evaluations of Their Motivations, Expectations and Experiences during Their First Donation Cycle. Fertility and Sterility, In press, 2009.
83. Marshall, P., et al., Public Consultation and Community Benefits: the HapMap Project in Nigeria. Journal of Medicine and Philosphy, invited.
84. Mehlman, M.J., Policy and perfection. Issues in Science and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, Invited.
85. Broder, S., The New Pregnancy Dilemma: Private and Public Cord Blood Banking and the Decision to Store or Donate Umbilical Cord Blood. Health Politics, Policy, and Law, Submitted.
86. Davis, D.S., et al., Ashkenazi Jews: Overburdened and Overexposed? Public Health Genomics, submitted.
87. Marshall, P., et al, The Language of Informed Consent: Genetic Research on Breast Cancer. Social Science and Medicine, submitted.
88. Mehlman, M.J., et al., Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects. Hastings Center Report, Submitted.
89. Quinn Griffin, M.T., et al., Survey of Research Methods in Genetic Family Studies: Implications for Policy Makers. Public Health Genomics, Submitted.
|
