CASE.EDU:    HOME | DIRECTORIES | SEARCH
case western reserve university

SAMUEL ROSENTHAL CENTER FOR
JUDAIC STUDIES

 

Midwest Jewish Studies Association - Shofar Book Reviews

Provided as a service by Case Western Reserve University

University of Nebraska Press

Shofar - Books Received

Shofar - Advertising &
Mailing List Info

Shofar - Book Reviews

Preaching in Judaism and Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity, by Alexander Deeg, Walter Homolka, and Heinz-Günther Schöttler. Studia Judaica  XLI.  Berlin and New York, Walter de Gruyter, 2008.  247 pp. $110.00.

In the last few decades, a remarkable change has taken place in the research on the relations between Jewish and Christian liturgical traditions. Up till recently, most scholars used a model that is now often called the “mother-daughter” paradigm. It was characterized by two major assumptions: a) that Christian liturgical traditions had their roots in Jewish ones and b) that, from a certain moment onwards, Jews and Christian liturgies went their own ways, completely independently from each other. At his moment, this model is more and more called into question (incidentally, this does not only hold for liturgy, but for other aspects of Jewish and Christian religious life as well), and instead a twin model is increasingly advocated which is inspired by the story of Jacob of Esau. This new model implies a questioning of the first assumption, the whole idea of the “Jewish roots” of Christian liturgy. The second assumption, namely that of a radical, once and for all “parting of the ways” from a certain moment onwards, is no less problematic than the first. Actually, there is increasing historical evidence that, over the centuries, at least Jewish forms of worship did not develop in complete isolation from the dominant majority religion.

This volume, which contains the papers presented at an international conference on “Preaching in Judaism and Christianity,” organized by the Universities of Bamberg and Erlangen with the Abraham Geiger College at the University of Potsdam, is an important contribution to the debate about the relationship between Jewish and Christian liturgies. It is so for two reasons. First, compared with other liturgical elements, such as prayer, the reading of Scripture, hymns and so on, the issue of homiletics has received rather little attention up till now, and already for that reason this book fills a gap. Its value is still further enhanced by the wide perspective from which the issue of preaching is studied: it encompasses all of the historical periods up to the twentieth century, and includes not only historical studies, but also reconstructions supplemented by contributions dealing with hermeneutical issues.

              Three papers deal with the period of Antiquity. Günter Stemberger critically discusses the evidence available for the existence of the rabbinic sermon. Contrary to Leopold Zunz, the author of the classical work entitled Die Vorträge der Juden (1832), Stemberger declares himself to be sceptical about the possibility of deriving direct knowledge from rabbinic, especially midrashic, sources concerning rabbinic preaching practice. Stemberger does not claim that there was no regular preaching in the synagogues of the rabbinic period. Neither does he deny that midrashic texts have been a source of inspiration for homilies. Still, according to him, at this moment, hardly anything can be said with certainty about the practice of Jewish preaching in rabbinic times.

              Whereas the role played by the homily in Rabbinic Judaism proves to be surrounded by a lot of uncertainty, its existence in Hellenistic Judaism is beyond any doubt. Folker Siegert presents it in his paper as a Hellenistic Jewish innovation which according to him originated in Greek-speaking Diaspora synagogues and was taken over by the Christians. Both papers comport remarkably well with the contribution of Annette von Stockhausen, which deals with the “Christian Perception of Jewish Preaching in Early Christianity.” The outcome of her investigation is, apparently somewhat to her own surprise, that convincing evidence for a Christian perception of Jewish preaching in the first centuries is lacking. This leads the author to raise the question whether the reason for this fact might not simply have been that “there was no such preaching in the synagogues in the late antique Roman Empire at all or that it at least was not as significant as it was for Jewish Christian worship as it was for the Christian” (p. 70). A good question indeed.

Two contributions allow us to catch a glimpse of homiletic religious interactions in later periods. Marc Saperstein convincingly demonstrates the remarkable impact which, from the scholastic period onwards, medieval Christian preaching had on the Jewish sermon. Jews made use of philosophical (scholastic) modes of argumentation that were borrowed from Christian models. For the rest it is remarkable that Jewish and Christian preachers were not just discussing the same issues, but also raising the same questions and even giving very similar answers. Next, Klaus Herrmann deals with the confirmation services, modelled on Protestant rituals, that entered German synagogues, especially Reform-oriented ones, in the nineteenth century. Sermons which often reflected the ideals of the Protestant majority culture and the Enlightenment played an important role in these ceremonies.

              Two contributions written by Yehoyada Amir and Walter Homolko deal with two modern Jewish philosophers, respectively Franz Rosenzweig and Leo Baeck. The sermon was no central issue in their works, but both of them preached and had interesting and original ideas about the character and the role of the sermon. For R., a good sermon is primarily neither a dialogical conversation (p. 123) nor a speech held in front of a public, but should stimulate mutual listening to a text and be the first educational step towards supreme silence (as the entire liturgy should be) (p. 124–126). As for Baeck, he was little concerned with the rhetorical aspects of the sermon and with decorum and, moreover, put remarkably little emphasis upon the role of the rabbi (pp. 152–154). As Homolka wrightly observes, this points back to the midrashic origin of the Jewish sermon (p. 154).

              The final four contributions deal with issues directly connected with present-day preaching practices in both Jewish and Christian communities. Heinz-Günther Schöttler addresses the much debated question as to how Christians should preach the Hebrew Bible and tries to develop a new understanding of the theological scheme of “promise and fulfilment,” which is based on the principle that the Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament, is not exhausted by Him who is called “Jesus Christ.” It rather means that Christ is—for Christians—the confirmation of God’s promise which came first to Israel (p. 163). Richard Sarason offers an instructive sketch of contemporary Jewish homiletics in the USA, especially since the 1960s. More in particular, he points to the increasing critique on the formal, Christian (?) type of sermon and its replacement with a variety of more informal forms of preaching.

              Finally, two articles which deal with hermeneutical topics betray an outspoken fascination with the “pre-modern” way of Jewish midrashic scriptural hermeneutics. Alexander Deeg and Martin Nicol argue that Christians might learn from their “homiletic twin” to consider the biblical text as “a space to get in rather than a springboard to get off” (p. 217). Uta Pohl-Patalog points to a remarkable similarity between the midrashic approach and modern homiletic models, especially that of the Bibliolog, which is closely related to and for a considerable part based on the theory of reader-response criticism.

              The papers collected in this volume do not give a comprehensive view of the relationship between Jewish and Christian preaching. Especially, the history of Jewish homiletics continues to raise many unsolved questions. There can, however, be no doubt that this book addresses a fascinating subject that deserves to be further investigated.

Gerard Rouwhorst

Faculty of Catholic Theology

University of Tilburg, Netherlands